Share Poll

Poll link

500 px
350 px
250 px
Preview

widget preview:

Width - px Height - px

Close preview
! You are using a non-supported browser Your browser version is not optimised for Toluna, we recommend that you install the latest version Upgrade
Our Privacy Notice governs your membership of our Influencer Panel, which you can access here. Our website uses cookies. Like in the offline world, cookies make things better. To learn more about the cookies we use, check out our Cookies policy.

TolunaTeamCA

  2 months ago

July Movie Results are in - share your review!
Closed

Hello Influencers!

You voted and we got the results! The movie up for review this month is……Bohemian Rhapsody!

Below shows how to participate and possibly earn up to a total of 6,000 points!

1- Write a review for the selected movie that is at least 150 words which is about 9 lines in a paragraph

2- Post the review in a comment to this topic

3- If you write a review that is at least 150 words, we will give you 1000 points to your account *

4- Check out the upcoming Toluna Magazine, the July issue and see if you got featured in the pages! If you got featured you will get an extra 5000 points!

Let the Movie Club Begin!

*Note- in order to get the points you must submit your review by Thursday, July 11th.
Reply

dianescharf1951

  2 months ago
I am a 67yr old teenager of the sixties and when I watched Bohemian Rhapsody I felt like I was actually at the original concert that I would have adored going to back then!!! You were never too young or too old to enjoy Queen's music back then and I had the same feeling when I watched the movie. It was amazing and thrilling and unbelievably realistic! Sitting in the theatre, my surroundings just melted away and then the whole theatre changed to what was on the screen - I was THERE with my baby blue jeans, my flower child blouse, my beige desert boots and my waist length thick hair just swaying to the music. The music was controlling my body and it was exhilerating!!!! I haven't felt like that for many years now and it felt awesome... It was masterfully made and produced, the music was perfect and the actors excelled in their roles. I went back again to see it again on the big screen and I couldn't stop myself from buying the CD heh-heh-heh!!!! It was a total masterpiece - Koodos to the people who made it for all of us, young and old, to enjoy such fantastic music. Thank you from the bottom of my heart - It made me realize that I'm not as old as I thought yea!!!!!!
1 comments

nmtoscano

  2 months ago
I thoroughly enjoyed Bohemian Rhapsody and here's why.First of all, I thought that the beginning was powerful.Freddie Mercury coming on stage to deliver his best theatrical, musical moment.I'm currently studying minimalist photography and the zooming effect of the beginning of the movie was just a blast to watch! I actually saw the Live Aid concert and was blown away how genuine it was! The wardrobes, the acting, the chemistry between the actors.I was forced into liking Queen when I was 12 years old.My family and I went to a family neighbor and Queen music was blasting in this person's home.There were Queen posters everywhere! I was not a fan at that time because I was bombarded with Queen.I am 51 years old and right now I am the biggest Queen fan!What I also like about the movie is how the music will make a comeback and will introduce a whole bunch of new young fans.I'm actually jealous of these people who will hear these amazing masterpieces for the first time.Even if you are not a fan of the band, there is something for everybody in this film.Rami Malek was also a superb choice to play Freddie.
1 comments

cogfxz

  2 months ago
ay be that the only way to experience a full measure of Queen nostalgia is not to have heard the band the first time around—to indulge in vicarious nostalgia, a homecoming to somebody else’s home. If so, “Bohemian Rhapsody,” a superficially clichéd yet thematically unusual bio-pic about the band’s lead singer and guiding spirit, Freddie Mercury (Rami Malek), delivers that secondhand rock memory by rooting its story less in the primary experience of the band’s performances than in a subtly revisionist, sharply current view of Mercury’s life and work. The movie has been criticized for its lack of attention to the specifics of his sex life. In fact, it is clear about Mercury’s sexual orientation. (In the movie, Freddie—as we’ll call the character, to distinguish him from the historical Mercury—states that he’s bisexual and is shown to be in two long-term relationships with men, though it only hints at any casual ones.) But “Bohemian Rhapsody” isn’t a comprehensive bio-pic, nor a full-spectrum consideration of Mercury’s life—it is a clearly and carefully oriented vision of his career. It’s mostly interested in his private life in relation to a single big idea: success and its price.
“Bohemian Rhapsody” offers nothing of Mercury’s childhood in Zanzibar, his schooling in Bombay, his lifelong devotion to rock and roll. The movie shows no years of dedicated practice or earlier musical life or ambition; his sole primordial effort is a song that he scribbles on a piece of paper and keeps folded up in his pocket while working, as a young man in London, as an airport baggage handler. Mercury, who played piano and guitar, is of course depicted as being possessed of a formidable vocal technique, a remarkable near-operatic voice—but it’s presented as a natural gift that’s also a curse. He was born, as Freddie says, with four extra incisors, and the larger oral chamber is the reason for his large vocal range. Freddie first shows off that range in a parking lot outside a club, where he’s trying to get members of a local band to take one of his songs. But the band has just lost its lead singer, and so Freddie does a spontaneous audition for them—not, however, before they make fun of his facial deformity and suggest that it’s an insurmountable obstacle to his becoming a band member, let alone its front man.
A protruding mouth isn’t the only trait for which Freddie endures insults. Born Farrokh Bulsara, he’s an ethnic Parsi, a descendant of the Zoroastrians who fled Persia for India more than a millennium ago; in Great Britain, he’s frequently insulted as a “Paki.” (At his airport job, he meekly replies that he’s not from Pakistan.) He’s also a bisexual man in a country that had only recently decriminalized homosexuality, at a time when it was widely considered shameful, or at least indecent. And he’s from a poor family whose struggles he relates to discrimination. In one of the movie’s exemplary scenes, Freddie is at home with his parents, planning an escape into music (and declaring that his name is no longer his given one of Farrokh but, rather, Freddie); his father instead preaches to him a credo, exhorting him to pursue “good thoughts, good words, good deeds.” Freddie’s retort isn’t a variation on “boring”—it’s, “And how has that worked out for you?” His father’s virtuous modesty hasn’t brought success in the face of prejudice; Freddie’s bold self-assertion is meant to do so.
When the band’s music begins to crystallize, Freddie masterminds its path to success. He decides that the band should sell its van to finance the recording of an album, and, in the studio, he orchestrates its production as well as the unusual studio techniques with which they create it. He gives the band the new name of Queen; he arranges the crucial meeting, with Elton John’s manager (Aidan Gillen), that will put the band on the map; and, at that meeting, he sells the manager on the band’s future hit-making successes. The scene offers Freddie one of the script’s great arias, on the subject of his ambitions, as he tells the businessman that he’s playing “for the outcasts in the back” because those are the people with whom he himself identifies.
The direction of the film (credited to Bryan Singer, who was fired late in the production and replaced by Dexter Fletcher but is granted sole credit) is often oddly denatured, flip, and incurious, and its lack of vision keeps the movie far short of its—and, above all, of Malek’s—finest inspirations. (The filming of Malek’s onstage performances as Freddie, which are chopped to bits and reduced to cliché-riddled snippets, is particularly insensitive.) But at its best the film is spare and clarifying, and ideologically unambiguous: its strength is in the positioning of Mercury as an artist who confronts opposition throughout society—including from the very institutions that he needs in order to succeed. The script offers Freddie another great aria to deliver, to a record-company executive (played by Mike Myers), in which he declares his ambition to make music with the power of opera, “the wit of Shakespeare, the unbridled joy of musical theatre,” intending to offer “something for everyone.” “We’ll speak in tongues if we want to,” he says. The song “Bohemian Rhapsody,” which the record company hesitated to record and then wouldn’t issue as a single, of course became a hit, at which point the movie offers a remarkable montage featuring quotes from reviews of the song, all negative. The very source of Freddie’s popularity—his keen insight into the humiliations and the frustrations of listeners, their strivings and their dreams, their search for love and visions of stifled grandeur—made him rich, famous, and artistically fulfilled, but critically derided.
For that matter, it’s only in those moments of performance, of communion with people who, each in their own way, share his sense of oppression and humiliation, that Freddie feels himself to be truly himself. His joy in performance is a joy in solidarity, and his life offstage can hardly match it. (He speaks of his partying life as a quest for distraction from the “in-between moments” when “the darkness comes back in” and, later, explains his drug use: “Being human is a condition that requires a little anesthesia.”) Yet for his success he’s not just beloved—he’s also subjected to the aggressive prying of gossip-mongers and paparazzi, the brickbats of critics, and the betrayal of intimates. And then he discovers that he’s sick; he’s diagnosed with aids; he realizes that he’s dying.
1 comments

Boobooz

  2 months ago
I am not isually a person who watches. Biographies or musical preformance style movies but here i was watching this movie based on the band Queen and Freddie Mercurys past and lofe story.
I must say that i wasnt a fan of the movie " Bohemian Rhapsody" in my perspective kind of dragged on and didnt seem to pinpoint the actual struggles of Freddie Mercury as i would have thought that it would outline. I actually fell asleep part way through the movie and ended up waking up as the credits were rolling across my screen.
I would not recommend this movie personally.
1 comments

oatman_a

  2 months ago
Although I did enjoy the movie and it was really well done, I don't think it was an accurate representation of Freddy mercury' s struggle. The music was great and I would definitely recommend it to friends. I just think that it was dumbed down. I think most people have an understanding of Freddy's story. The movie could have used a little more substance. This is just my opinion and I think that I like a lot of things that others would be bored by. I think more focus should have been placed on mercury's mental struggle and the challenges of being unsure about his sexuality.
1 comments

L4980738l

  2 months ago
Bohemian Rhapsody was a great movie! I really enjoyed the music and was interested to learn about the history of the group. I watched 'A Star in Born' before seeing this movie and felt that Lady Gaga and Bradley Cooper did a better job carrying that movie than Remi Malick did in this one. I was saddened to learn about the story and/or relationship between him and his wife. I liked that the group was close and took care of each other. It was easy to get lost in the movie and forget that you were watching actors and not the actual member of the band Queen. I really enjoyed the movie...it was nice to have a new memory of Queen's music, taking it back from Mike Meyers and Dana Carvey, a la Wayne's World!! Worth the money...see it in the theater..
1 comments

A5736064n

  2 months ago
Bohemian Rhapsody is released in the UK on 24 October, Australia on 1 November and the US on 2 November.
There is no lack of material to work with, given Queen’s stratospheric rise and Mercury’s tragic fall – he died from Aids-related illness in 1991. Not to mention the on-the-face of it improbability of a straight, white rock band fronted by a flamboyant, gay man of Asian descent. Perhaps as a result of the personnel changes, Bohemian Rhapsody struggles to find a fresh way to tell its story. It begins with Zanzibari immigrant Farrokh Bulsara forsaking his traditional family and racist 1970s smalltown for the glamour of rock’n’roll, then skirts dangerously close to Spinal Tap territory, what with microphone-stand malfunctions and old-school industry execs telling our be-mulleted quartet what to do.
But even at this stage it feels like the story is being told with the benefit of hindsight. Malek’s Mercury seems to arrive fully formed and entirely confident that everything will work out, and some of the dialogue is just too on the nose to ring true (“there’s no musical ghetto that can contain us”; “I won’t compromise my vision any longer”). All of which almost cheats us of the anticipated first-act rush of success.
The singing voice is apparently an “amalgamation”, not Malek’s own, but on stage he apes Mercury’s strutting, virile bravado with dynamic conviction, particularly in the climactic recreation of Queen’s legendary Live Aid performance. It’s a feat of impersonation.
The real problem is how to handle Mercury’s off-stage life. On the one hand, there is the story of Mercury’s relationship with Mary Austin, played by Lucy Boynton. They begin as lovers and even become engaged, although it is as clear to her as it is to us that Mercury is bisexual, if not gay. The film’s most moving scene is where Mercury admits to this, and to his complex feelings of love for Mary. “I want you in my life,” he tells her. “Why?” she replies.
But on the other hand, there’s also Mercury’s bromance with the other members of Queen to address. Two of them, Brian May and Roger Taylor, co-produced the movie, after all (plus the band’s manager, Jim Beach). Sacha Baron Cohen allegedly walked from the movie when May outlined a story to him where Mercury’s death comes halfway through, “and the band goes from strength to strength”.
A bolder film might have explored the relationship between Mercury’s hedonism, his mostly closeted sexuality and his on and off-stage personas in a more nuanced way. Or at least taken its cue from Mercury’s own songbook and played it with some melodramatic abandon. This is a man who responded to his Aids diagnosis with songs like Who Wants To Live Forever? and The Show Must Go On, after all. As it is, this one seeks to tick the biographical boxes and wrap everything up neatly with a redemptive finale. That comes via the Live Aid performance, which could be either seen as an impressive technical feat or an extended karaoke session, but at least ends the story on a high. Bohemian Rhapsody honours Mercury the showman but never really gets to Mercury the person.
1 comments

vitaliminya

  2 months ago
Would Farrokh Bulsara approve of the movie made about his life with his band Queen? Queen, the movie … It’s a great watch to discover the music of an incredible band and the unique voice that was the lead singer. It covers the humble beginnings of a strange man who follows his heart and works his way to the top of a world of music and Hollywood showmanship. Many of us only know the songs played on retro radio stations, but we don’t know about the fight it took Freddy Mercury and his fellow band members Brian May, Roger Taylor and John Deacon to get there. Freddy faced many personal demons, getting involved in drugs, alcohol and relationships with men that would lead him to feel hallow and empty. He forgot about those who were his family and eventually left the band for a solo career. Through the movie we experience theses ups and downs with him, the pain of this family and friends and the wonderful reunion that was possible in time for Live Aid. The band’s songs are wonderfully set to master the emotions in the film and the movie ends at one of the band’s greatest moments.
1 comments

carmen-20008

  2 months ago
In 1970, Farrokh Bulsara, a British student of Parsi origin who works transporting luggage at Heathrow airport, goes to a nightclub to see a local band called Smile. After the presentation, Farrokh meets guitarist Brian May and drummer Roger Taylor, and offers himself to be the band's new vocalist after the departure of his singer and bassist Tim Staffell. With the arrival of bassist John Deacon, the band (now known as Queen) plays in small places around England until they decide to sell their truck to produce their debut album. Their musical style allows them a contract with EMI Records. At the same time, Farrokh changes his name to Freddie Mercury and begins a relationship with Mary Austin. During the first tour of the band by the United States, Freddie begins to have doubts about his sexuality.
In 1975, Queen recorded her album A Night at the Opera, but decided to leave EMI executive Ray Foster when he refused to publish the six-minute song "Bohemian Rhapsody" as the album's first single. Freddie makes Capital Radio DJ Kenny Everett make the song debut by airing it. Despite having mixed reviews, "Bohemian Rhapsody" becomes a massive success. Shortly after giving Mary an engagement ring, they end their relationship when Freddie reveals that she is bisexual. He begins a relationship and labor with Paul Prenter, the second representative of the band.
1 comments

Pink03

  2 months ago
What a great movie about one of the greatest theatrical style rock bands to ever be. An insight into the accentric Freddie Mercury. A bit of a strange but genius of a man who can never be replaced. Queen made a mark on history like no other. There music and story in this movie will carry on for future generations. The last days of a man taken too soon but never to be forgotten . Lifelong fans as well as a younger generation of fans will be intrigued by this film. Destined to be a classic. Well done .A fascinating rockumentary . A glimpse into fame and the pros and sometimes tragic cons. All great stories need to be brought to light and the talented cast bring this one to life in such an interesting and true to life manner. Projecting the performancses of a band so alive in such a tasteful and fitting way. Theater portraying theatrical. The magic known as Queen...
1 comments
Copied to clipboard

5   Followers

You’re almost there

In order to create content on the community

Verify your Email / resend
No thanks, I’m just looking

OK
Cancel
We have disabled our Facebook login process. Please enter your Facebook email to receive a password creation link.
Please enter a valid Email
Cancel
We're working on it...
When you upload a picture, our site looks better.
Upload